In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS (CSRS individuals are exempted for this particular issue), the Federal or Postal employee who is contemplating filing for the benefit must at some point in the process file for Social Security Disability benefits (SSDI). This is because the law is set up for an off-setting feature between the two “pockets” of benefits — where, in the first year, there is a 100% offset between FERS & SSDI, and a 60% offset every year thereafter.
In some rare instances, Social Security will approve a person’s disability application before the Office of Personnel Management has approved a FERS Disability Retirement application. In that instance, one can use the SSDI approval as “persuasive” evidence to the Office of Personnel Management. It is not determinative evidence, but there are legal arguments to be made which essentially state that, since a person has been found to be “totally disabled” by the Social Security Administration, based upon the same or identical medical evidence and documentation, that the Office of Personnel Management should grant a FERS Disability Retirement application based upon the same or identical medical evidence.
Is the reverse true? If a FERS Disability Retirement application is approved, can such an approval be used as evidence — persuasive or determinative — for an SSDI application? That would be a weaker argument, precisely because OPM Disability Retirement does not make a determination of total disability, but rather, a decision that the Federal or Postal employee cannot perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s particular kind of job. Moreover, the Social Security Administration might also argue that inasmuch as SSDI does allow for some earned income (about $1,000 per month) from a job, such allowance shows that approval of a FERS Disability Retirement, which recognizes that one is merely disabled from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s particular kind of job, should not be determinative of a Social Security criteria which requires a higher standard of disability.
Knowing what impact each aspect or element of a process will have upon another is an important step in preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application. As knowledge is the source of success, utilization of such knowledge is the pathway to an approval in a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS and CSRS.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability & SSA Social Security Disability Benefits Tagged: attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, condition that prevents to perform the essential functions, essential elements of jobs, essential requirements of a job and total disability concepts, fdr and ssdi offset or interaction, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, federal employees considering ssdi and ssi, federal stress disability criteria, federal workers disability criteria, fers disability applicants and the impact of an ssdi approval, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement is not a total disability system, how a ssdi approval impact my federal disability retirement application, if my ssdi is approved before my fers disability application, medical evidence, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm critical essential element, opm disability and social security eligibility, OPM disability retirement, opm disability retirement and the total disability concept, opm supportive medical documentation, postal and social security disability, Postal disability, Social Security and OPM disability relationship, ssdi and fers disability, the ssdi requirement for disabled postal employee, total disability concept that won't apply to opm disability retirement, USPS disability retirement, usps medical documentation requirements
